<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grey as Rain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webusability.se/blog/2007/06/27/grey-as-rain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webusability.se/blog/2007/06/27/grey-as-rain/</link>
	<description>Creating a Web with Better Usability, Piece by Piece</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.webusability.se/blog/2007/06/27/grey-as-rain/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webusability.se/blog/2007/06/27/grey-as-rain/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I think that a persons background when it comes to webdesign has a lot to do with how he/she works today. When I did my first website I started with the code right away. The &quot;design&quot; was just in my head. Back then it was more important to play with blink and marquee-tags then to figure out how it would look in the end. I was more fascinated with the code than the design process - still am. 

Doing the whole design in Photoshop feels really redundant. A worse case scenario would be that my skills in Photoshop (or should I say &#039;lack of skills&#039;?) would actually restrict me from doing what I see in my head. Why not use a pen and a paper? I most certainly would not be able to aply the Photoshop process in my work as a newspaper design editor. Sometimes, when I feel that the articles I&#039;m working with are really complex, I have to sketch on paper. But then I keep it on a very basic level. It&#039;s only for straightening out the mess in my head just a little bit so I know what elements I&#039;m working with. Of course I realize that using Photoshop doesn&#039;t really apply to me - since it would be pointless to use one design program (Photoshop) before actually doing the real design in another (Indesign). But still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that a persons background when it comes to webdesign has a lot to do with how he/she works today. When I did my first website I started with the code right away. The &#8220;design&#8221; was just in my head. Back then it was more important to play with blink and marquee-tags then to figure out how it would look in the end. I was more fascinated with the code than the design process &#8211; still am. </p>
<p>Doing the whole design in Photoshop feels really redundant. A worse case scenario would be that my skills in Photoshop (or should I say &#8216;lack of skills&#8217;?) would actually restrict me from doing what I see in my head. Why not use a pen and a paper? I most certainly would not be able to aply the Photoshop process in my work as a newspaper design editor. Sometimes, when I feel that the articles I&#8217;m working with are really complex, I have to sketch on paper. But then I keep it on a very basic level. It&#8217;s only for straightening out the mess in my head just a little bit so I know what elements I&#8217;m working with. Of course I realize that using Photoshop doesn&#8217;t really apply to me &#8211; since it would be pointless to use one design program (Photoshop) before actually doing the real design in another (Indesign). But still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
